These are the facts on Global Warming, laid out by Nobel Laureate, Ivar Giaever.
I challenge you to watch this video – what your opinion on global warming is currently. If you have an open mind, you may see that this is a very intelligent physicist giving his opinion based on data. If you need more proof, read on.
In this video, Ivar talks about his worry regarding the Climate Conference that was scheduled to be held in Paris November 30, 2015.
This page on the Schiller Institute states A Resolution To Defend the Lives of Billions of People: We Say NO to the Paris COP21 “CO2 Reduction Scheme”
From that page:
Despite the climate-change narrative being presented by an extremely well-funded, top-down propaganda campaign, there is an immense amount of solid scientific evidence which clearly contradicts and/or refutes the claims of coming catastrophic climate change caused by human emissions of greenhouse gases.
Because many climate models are using these false assumptions of high climate sensitivity to CO2, the predictions of these climate models have been consistently wrong, and with each year they are diverging further from reality. The gradual changes in the climate that have occurred over the recent decades, and the gradual changes which will continue to occur in the future, are not and will not be a cause for alarm. Most of these changes are natural, and any impact mankind may have would be relatively minor. A healthy and growing world economy will be able to adapt to these changes.
We must also recognize that CO2 is not a pollutant—it is an essential part of the biosphere. Because the present atmospheric CO2 levels are well below the optimum for plant growth, human-caused increases in CO2 concentrations are already contributing to increases in agricultural productivity and natural plant growth—creating a measurably greener planet.
But the Paris 2015 summit is not only about nations potentially wasting time and resources on a phantom problem existing only inside computer models—the ugly reality is that the CO2 reduction programs being proposed would increase poverty, lower living conditions, and accelerate death rates around the world. The world simply cannot support a growing population with improving conditions of life using only solar, wind, and other forms of so-called “green” energy.
Professor Carl-Otto Wiess, adviser to the European Institute for Climate and Energy; Former President of the National Metrology Institute of Germany, Braunschweig, used spectral analysis of all long-term climate data to show that all climate change is due to natural cycles, and there is no signal at all from our CO2 emissions.
Professor Carl-Otto Wiess published a paper which explains all recent climate changes in terms of natural climate cycles instead of the fairy-tale of CO2-driven climate.
Lüdecke, H. J., Hempelmann, A., & Weiss, C. O. (2013). Multi-periodic climate dynamics: spectral analysis of long-term instrumental and proxy temperature records. Climate of the Past, 9(1), 447-452.
The Global Warming Hoax, Paris Climate Accord and NWO Global Governance By Joachim Hagopian April 25, 2016
Trump wins U.S. Presidency! Climate Skeptics Rejoice! Set to dismantle & Defund UN/EPA climate agenda!
10 Things You Can Do to Take Action on Global Warming
Dr Fred Goldberg Squashes Climate Alarmism
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Originally broadcasted March 8, 2007 on British Channel 4.
A documentary, by British television producer Martin Durkin, which argues against the virtually unchallenged consensus that global warming is man-made. A statement from the makers of this film asserts that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming could very well be “the biggest scam of modern times.”
In 2009, there was a hack of major climate change “scientists” emails and they were shown to be manipulating the data. Why can't we find a Climategate summary like this in US Media
Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation
Why can't we find a Climategate summary like this in US Media
Mark Steyn rebukes democrats in climate hearing: ‘You're effectively enforcing a state ideology'
I have no problem with voluntarily moving away from fossil fuels. It's the forced global tax on energy that bothers me. It's the false science behind the money grabbing politics bothers me. The geo-engineering based on the false science that is killing people and making many species extinct around the globe. The scientists that are not funded by climate change supporters state that raising CO2 is actually shown to COOL the planet. Any correction that is put in place to stop global warming could send us in a spiral to global cooling!
The elite are funding this whole false narrative to mask their true agenda. Billions have been spent by Soros and his like on spreading this lie. People are polarized about it and the repeated talking point by global warming believers is that 99% of the scientists are behind it. We have a growing number of people who believe this Paris agreement was a good idea when it is actually the signing of a death certificate for millions who are already struggling. Rising energy costs hurts one group… the poor. Does it occur to these climate supporters that a high percentage are behind it because their funding depends on it? Not because they truly believe the data supports the narrative?
Please comment and add your information and facts on climate change and whether or not you believe global warming is a hoax.